Baku: Azerbaijan's state tourism agency is aggressively working to improve the country's travel appeal, launching an initiative earlier this year to attract more international visitors. This move aligns with the government's history of spending generously on enhancing its global image, as demonstrated by hosting events like the Eurovision Song Contest, Formula 1 races, and the European Games.According to Global Voices, the agency recently allocated AZN 135,039.37 (USD 79,000) to VATA, a limited liability company, to organize trips for 30 guests, including journalists, bloggers, and tourism companies from South Korea and Israel. This initiative has sparked debate due to Azerbaijan's closed land borders since the pandemic began in 2020. Initially attributed to COVID-19 concerns, the rationale shifted to national security concerns in March 2024, as reiterated by President Ilham Aliyev before COP29 in April 2024.The closed borders have limited access to affordable travel options for Azerbaijani citizens and r estricted low-budget tourists from visiting the country. Affordability remains a concern, with mid-range hotel prices ranging from AZN 60-80 (USD 35-47) per night, and luxury resorts significantly higher. For citizens earning the median wage of AZN 571 (USD 335) per month, these costs are prohibitive, making domestic tourism largely inaccessible.As of January 1, 2025, the minimum wage in Azerbaijan is AZN 400 (USD 235), while the average monthly salary is around AZN 1043 (USD 613). However, income inequality is significant, with many earning below the average.International visitors may not be aware of these economic challenges, as state tourism promotions highlight the country's attractions while glossing over social, economic, and political issues. Human rights groups report 375 political prisoners, rampant rights abuses, and widespread corruption, while local journalists face imprisonment or exile.Azerbaijan ranks low on democracy and freedom indexes, with Reporters Without Borders ranking it 167th ou t of 180 countries and Freedom House describing it as a consolidated authoritarian regime. While promoting a country is common, such campaigns may appear superficial given the leadership's suppression of civil society and independent voices.